An Outcry to the World from Israel — Airing Our Dirty Laundry in Public.
Before political correctness was a thing, I sat with an Australian Aboriginal human rights lawyer one evening in the home of a mutual friend. At the time, I knew very little about Aboriginal history and culture, but having grown up in Apartheid South Africa, I understood the atrocities of which man was capable of committing; the decimation of entire peoples in the name of civilization.
Like many Aboriginal Australians, he was from what is commonly refered to as ‘the Stolen Generation’. As recently as 1970, Aboriginal children under the age of five, were forcibly removed from their families by state run agencies and sent to live with white families where they were educated and groomed for ‘integration’ into white Australian culture. The irony of having been educated in white man’s law, only as a result of the institutionalized racist policies he would later come to oppose, was not lost. But for him it was more emotionally complicated than that. Returning to his people, with all the trappings of his white education, he found himself in a cultural no-man’s land, alienated from the language and customs of his childhood, and unable to identify with his kin — a common story for those with whom he shared a fate.
We discussed the media-popular-politically correct topics of the day; Aboriginal land rights, unemployment, alcoholism in tribal communities — the youth seen wondering in remote areas with buckets hanging around their necks, sniffing petrol — a cheap high. And of course, the great cultural schisms between the integrated and dis-integrated Aboriginals, of which he was an obvious victim. And then he raised the issues of child sex abuse where elders were accustomed to taking to themselves underaged girls in forced union, and domestic violence perpetrated against aboriginal women and children. I was as shocked by the topics as I was by the disclosures. No-one was talking about any of this in the media. Where were the feminists, the Aboriginal feminists? Why had they remained silent on these issues?
Persecuted minorities have an inherent understanding of what one might call tribal lore — the tribe must be protected at all times. But I was intrigued by the ethical question. At what point do we air our dirty laundry outside the walls of tribal secrecy? When is the protection of the individual more important than the protection of the group? Though Judaism is steeped in Jewish law (halacha), we too have our share of unspoken lore.
In March 2008, the principle of the Addas Israel School in Melbourne, boarded a plane and fled to Israel. That same day, sexual abuse charges were filed against her, but before a warrant for her arrest could be issued, the school authorities shipped her out in the middle of the night. Instead of supporting the victims, the board members of the religious school betrayed the very values they claimed to espouse as religious Jews, in order to protect their community from the potential shame the allegations might have brought upon it, and upon them.
The three sisters who brought forth the allegations waited twelve excruciating years before Malka Leifer was extradited to Australia, (in January 2021), to stand trial for no less than seventy four charges of rape and sexual abuse against them and others who later came forward. International pressure had everything to do with the final progress of the hearing which had been repeatedly stalled by what we call in Israel, ‘proteczia’- protection. The religious sect to which Leifer belongs seemed to wield significant influence — connections in the religious world hold heavy weight in Israel. The judge was repeatedly ‘convinced’ that psychiatric evaluations which rendered her psychologically unfit for extradition, were legitimate, in spite of concrete evidence to the contrary. But it took significant lobbying from her victims to Australian government members before enough pressure was put on Israel to move the case forward. International opinion matters.
These last few months have brought a frenzied outcry to the world from Israel after Bibi Netanyahu signed a private deal with Pfizer enrolling the entire nation in an experimental medical procedure without their consent, a direct contravention of the Nuremberg codes which state: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely necessary. Furthermore, the discriminatory green passport issued only to those who participate in the experiment restricts entry into restaurants, hotels, gyms, clubs, places of work and educational institutions to those who refuse, in contravention to the clause: the person involved should be able to exercise free power of choice without the intervention of any element of force …or other forms of constraint of coercion. And finally: the person should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision, has hardly been upheld.
Standing on a platform of human and medical rights, political newcomer Arieh Avni and his party Rappeh (which means heal), have spoken out boldly on the international stage drawing attention to the controversy. In a marathon of interviews leading up to the election, party member Ilana Rachel Daniels expressed an emotional plea to the world in an audio post which went viral, catching the attention of international interviewers such as Flavio in Amsterdam and Dell Bigtree from the Highwire. Her heartfelt pleas were recorded in a you-tube video entitled Outcry to The World from Israel which has been viewed 1.3 million times to date. In an interview with Daniels, German lawyer Reinner Fuellmich responded in shock, saying, “Here in Germany, and in the United States…people would be outraged if this was done to them. This would be taking matters way too far.”
Fuellmich claims that the level and depth of damage that has been and continues to be caused to humanity by the covid-19 regulations and this orchestrated crisis, is meagre in comparison to all cases of fraud by German companies he has successfully sued, including the Deutsche Bank and Volkswagen. Fuellmich feels so strongly about the violation that he has filed a complaint with the Nuremberg court. And he is not alone. On behalf of Anshei Emet, an organization made up of prominant Israeli doctors, lawyers and public activists, lawyers Ruth Machnes and Aryeh Suchowolski have lodged their complaint with the both the Hague and Israel’s High Courts concerning violations of the Nuremberg code by the Israeli government and other parties.
But many are mortified that Israelis would turn to the Hague, the judicial wing of the United Nations with its shameless history of anti-Israel sentiment and its obvious lack of balanced judicial inquiry of multiple human rights violations bar those perpetrated by Israel. But where else is one to turn? Perhaps Israel’s High Courts, which just last week ruled governments restrictions on travel numbers and on those without the experimental ‘vaccine’, to be unconstitutional. But is that enough? Were Israel left to her own devices, would we see the transcendence from lore to law in a country whose governing bodies are fraught with corruption?
In multiple International lawsuits against the WHO and others, Fuellmich and his team plan to ask the following questions: Is there actually a corona pandemic or have the unreliable PCR tests knowingly been used to create the illusion of one? And do the so-called anti Corona measures actually serve to protect the people from the virus or are they designed to serve the pharmaceutical and tech industries and their financial interests?
If Fuellmich’s claims turn out to be true, that this has been the greatest crime committed against humanity, for our part as a major player in this grand experiment, now aimed at the heads of our children, surely even we can be forgiven for going public.
NOTE: I have no information on the artist whose work I would like to credit. Mask addition by the author.
